<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reduce Agricultural Subsidies to Reduce Waistlines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.showmedaily.org/2010/07/reduce-agricultural-subsidies.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.showmedaily.org/2010/07/reduce-agricultural-subsidies.html</link>
	<description>Advancing liberty with responsibility by promoting market solutions for Missouri public policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 16:17:46 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dempster holland</title>
		<link>http://www.showmedaily.org/2010/07/reduce-agricultural-subsidies.html/comment-page-1#comment-7625</link>
		<dc:creator>dempster holland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 15:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showmedaily.org/?p=19597#comment-7625</guid>
		<description>The purpose of agricultural subsidies is to keep farmers in business. It is the peculiar nature of farming that a farm can be wiped out with several years of bad weather, and it takes time to create a new farm. Since we have to eat in the short run, and do so every day, we have a basic self-interest in keeping the farm sysytem going.  Consider the taxes paid to maintain agricultural subsidies as merely part of the cost of buying food: that can of beans costs the retail price at the store plus x cents reflecting the subsidy cost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The purpose of agricultural subsidies is to keep farmers in business. It is the peculiar nature of farming that a farm can be wiped out with several years of bad weather, and it takes time to create a new farm. Since we have to eat in the short run, and do so every day, we have a basic self-interest in keeping the farm sysytem going.  Consider the taxes paid to maintain agricultural subsidies as merely part of the cost of buying food: that can of beans costs the retail price at the store plus x cents reflecting the subsidy cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveG</title>
		<link>http://www.showmedaily.org/2010/07/reduce-agricultural-subsidies.html/comment-page-1#comment-7181</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 19:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showmedaily.org/?p=19597#comment-7181</guid>
		<description>I think waistlines would definitely be reduced with the elimination of the subsidies.  The poor would have a much harder time being able to afford a 2000 calorie/day diet.

http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/12/05/a-high-price-for-healthy-food/

“Not only are the empty calories cheaper, but the healthy foods are becoming more and more expensive. Vegetables and fruits are rapidly becoming luxury goods.”

&quot;Still, even those who consume twice as much in junk food calories are still spending far less than healthy eaters.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think waistlines would definitely be reduced with the elimination of the subsidies.  The poor would have a much harder time being able to afford a 2000 calorie/day diet.</p>
<p><a href="http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/12/05/a-high-price-for-healthy-food/" rel="nofollow">http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/12/05/a-high-price-for-healthy-food/</a></p>
<p>“Not only are the empty calories cheaper, but the healthy foods are becoming more and more expensive. Vegetables and fruits are rapidly becoming luxury goods.”</p>
<p>&#8220;Still, even those who consume twice as much in junk food calories are still spending far less than healthy eaters.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

