North Carolina and American Express Provide a Good Example
According to an editorial in the News & Record in Greensboro, N.C., American Express chose that state’s Guilford County as the location for its new $600 million data center. This is a big deal for the following reason:
The financial services giant [...] never asked for millions of dollars in incentives that the Greensboro City Council and Guilford County Board of Commissioners were prepared to consider.
This is advantageous for taxpayers in North Carolina and in Guilford County. Not only will they experience job growth and productive economic activity, they don’t have to subsidize those jobs.
Furthermore, their tax money can be diverted to programs that have a higher priority, such as education or infrastructure, or returned to them to save or to spend in the private sector.
Additionally, because AmEx remains in the tax base, the state and local government in North Carolina can assess a tax rate that’s lower and more equal for all taxpayers. Unlike the new IBM service center in Columbia, Mo., AmEx will contribute property tax revenues, which will benefit public schools in the area.
The News & Record editorial also says:
[American Express] operates on an ethic of giving to the community, not taking from it, and now it has enhanced that reputation many times over.
I applaud the restraint that American Express has shown, and I hope that other corporations follow this example in their own expansion efforts. According to the editorial, a computer distribution center has also opened in the area without government incentives.
North Carolina is fortunate because profitable, confident businesses like American Express are moving to the state on their own volition, and without the financial assistance of the government. (If only Missouri were so lucky!)
Hat tip to John Payne.





North Carolina is fortunate because profitable, confident businesses like American Express are moving to the state on their own volition, and without the financial assistance of the government. (If only Missouri were so lucky!)
Does luck have anything to do with it? One time events, sure, but over time, the house always wins.
I used the IDEAS link, pretty poorly I think, and couldn’t find any tax structure advantage of North Carlina over Missouri. Universities? Geography? Climate? Labor Laws?
I hate the tax giveaways that some companies get and ending the giveaway culture is, I believe, a worthwhile goal.
Comment by Papillon — May 27, 2010 @ 9:26 a.m.
Please excuse my poor word choice. I agree with your observation that luck has nothing to do with attracting business to a state. I agree that tax structures and political equations are responsible for it.
The IDEAS website includes only fiscal and economic data. Although I think that non-economic data is outside of the scope of the web tool, is that something that you would find valuable?
Comment by Christine Harbin — May 27, 2010 @ 10:09 a.m.
The non-economic scope would be great to know, but incredibly difficult to quantify. Things like the political culture where it may be more ‘pay to play’ in certain places than in others. That example (with individual politicians having great influence) seems to be outside the scope of this blog, and that is ok.
With greater political influence in the economy, things are becoming more difficult to predict/rely on.
Comment by Papillon — June 1, 2010 @ 10:40 a.m.