<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Study Says Film Production Incentives Don&#8217;t Incite Economic Growth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.showmedaily.org/2010/01/new-study-says-film-production.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.showmedaily.org/2010/01/new-study-says-film-production.html</link>
	<description>Advancing liberty with responsibility by promoting market solutions for Missouri public policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 12:24:42 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: State Policy Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Lesson Applied to Film Production Incentives</title>
		<link>http://www.showmedaily.org/2010/01/new-study-says-film-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-5552</link>
		<dc:creator>State Policy Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Lesson Applied to Film Production Incentives</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 23:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showmedaily.org/?p=12327#comment-5552</guid>
		<description>[...] rebates from $4.5 million to $10 million. Although I&#8217;m getting bored of blogging about the production incentives program in Missouri, I want to refute the specific points that Hunt made in his most [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rebates from $4.5 million to $10 million. Although I&#8217;m getting bored of blogging about the production incentives program in Missouri, I want to refute the specific points that Hunt made in his most [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine Harbin</title>
		<link>http://www.showmedaily.org/2010/01/new-study-says-film-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-5046</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine Harbin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showmedaily.org/?p=12327#comment-5046</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment. 
Missouri&#039;s film tax program is structured like Michigan&#039;s in that regard. Plus, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.missouribusiness.net/film/incentives.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the tax credit is sellable and transferable&lt;/a&gt;. My concern is that Missouri will follow the example of Michigan if it continues and/or increases the program.

Can out-of-state cast and crew qualify for the production incentive program in Illinois? From the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chicagostudiocity.net/tax_incentive.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;information on your website&lt;/a&gt;, it looks like the production company needs to include Illinois staff members.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment.<br />
Missouri&#8217;s film tax program is structured like Michigan&#8217;s in that regard. Plus, <a href="http://www.missouribusiness.net/film/incentives.asp" rel="nofollow">the tax credit is sellable and transferable</a>. My concern is that Missouri will follow the example of Michigan if it continues and/or increases the program.</p>
<p>Can out-of-state cast and crew qualify for the production incentive program in Illinois? From the <a href="http://www.chicagostudiocity.net/tax_incentive.htm" rel="nofollow">information on your website</a>, it looks like the production company needs to include Illinois staff members.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Crededio</title>
		<link>http://www.showmedaily.org/2010/01/new-study-says-film-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-5042</link>
		<dc:creator>John Crededio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showmedaily.org/?p=12327#comment-5042</guid>
		<description>I can see were MPI&#039;s do not work if a State allows the incentive to include rebates that are labor and business that are not from the State giving the incentive. Like Michigan does! That State does not reap the benifit if the revenues earned are spent in other States or Country for that matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see were MPI&#8217;s do not work if a State allows the incentive to include rebates that are labor and business that are not from the State giving the incentive. Like Michigan does! That State does not reap the benifit if the revenues earned are spent in other States or Country for that matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

