“Missouri First”: Tax Credits Go From Bad to Worse
As Christine Harbin has convincingly argued, targeted tax incentives for businesses are a poor use of resources. When the state gives a tax credit to a particular company or industry, that recipient gains at the expense of everyone else.
Now here’s a worse idea: Fiddling with tax credit programs so that a larger percentage of available credits goes to companies that were located in Missouri to begin with (as opposed to out-of-state businesses that came here to get the tax break). If all companies in an industry have a chance at getting a tax credit, it’s possible that the most productive one will win it. It would still be a wasteful use of tax dollars, but the waste would at least be kept to a minimum. If, however, the tax credit program is rigged so that it favors preexisting Missouri companies, the state ends up picking a winner once, in singling out an industry for the subsidy, and then it makes yet another arbitrary choice based on location rather than merit. That compounds the inefficiency.





It appears to me that Missouri wants to bribe in-state companies to stay.
This is different from the purpose of most targeted tax credits, which is, as you point out, to give companies outside of Missouri an incentive to relocate here.
Comment by Christine Harbin — January 6, 2010 @ 10:20 a.m.