<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should Farmers Pay More Property Taxes?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.showmedaily.org/2009/12/should-farmers-pay-more-property-taxes.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.showmedaily.org/2009/12/should-farmers-pay-more-property-taxes.html</link>
	<description>Advancing liberty with responsibility by promoting market solutions for Missouri public policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:56:48 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Stokes</title>
		<link>http://www.showmedaily.org/2009/12/should-farmers-pay-more-property-taxes.html/comment-page-1#comment-4580</link>
		<dc:creator>David Stokes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 19:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showmedaily.org/?p=10463#comment-4580</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the excellent comments. To Papillon&#039;s point, in my concluding paragraph I was primarily referring to the lower tax on the land, not the property. So I certainly agree with Papillon that the personal property (my car) and the farmer&#039;s farm equipment (the tractor) should be taxed at the same rate. I don&#039;t think the farm equipment should necessarily go up to 1/3 assessment. I am sure there is a revenue-neutral middle-ground where they can be made even.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the excellent comments. To Papillon&#8217;s point, in my concluding paragraph I was primarily referring to the lower tax on the land, not the property. So I certainly agree with Papillon that the personal property (my car) and the farmer&#8217;s farm equipment (the tractor) should be taxed at the same rate. I don&#8217;t think the farm equipment should necessarily go up to 1/3 assessment. I am sure there is a revenue-neutral middle-ground where they can be made even.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Papillon</title>
		<link>http://www.showmedaily.org/2009/12/should-farmers-pay-more-property-taxes.html/comment-page-1#comment-4544</link>
		<dc:creator>Papillon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showmedaily.org/?p=10463#comment-4544</guid>
		<description>All taxes distort behavior, but taxes are, well, pretty necessary.

Taxing one item, tractor, at a lower rate than another, auto, is not a good idea.  Let the farmer get what the market will bear for the goods, and have the taxes be collected without favor to one industry or another.  

&#039;But we&#039;ll starve!!&#039;  I doubt it, people will store up the food knowing that a famine will come, other suppliers will be found etc.  The prices may spike every once in a while, but it is preferred to the alternative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All taxes distort behavior, but taxes are, well, pretty necessary.</p>
<p>Taxing one item, tractor, at a lower rate than another, auto, is not a good idea.  Let the farmer get what the market will bear for the goods, and have the taxes be collected without favor to one industry or another.  </p>
<p>&#8216;But we&#8217;ll starve!!&#8217;  I doubt it, people will store up the food knowing that a famine will come, other suppliers will be found etc.  The prices may spike every once in a while, but it is preferred to the alternative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gina</title>
		<link>http://www.showmedaily.org/2009/12/should-farmers-pay-more-property-taxes.html/comment-page-1#comment-4525</link>
		<dc:creator>gina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showmedaily.org/?p=10463#comment-4525</guid>
		<description>Interesting article, David. Informative.  The issue does seem a bit more complicated than might first meet the eye, and you illuminated that well. Contrast the farm issues here in Missouri compared to those 40,000 unemployed  for the sake of a bait fish.     20 BILLION dollars in farm production...gone.  So what will THAT do to our food prices? 

Sometimes good old common sense in these matters can go a long way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article, David. Informative.  The issue does seem a bit more complicated than might first meet the eye, and you illuminated that well. Contrast the farm issues here in Missouri compared to those 40,000 unemployed  for the sake of a bait fish.     20 BILLION dollars in farm production&#8230;gone.  So what will THAT do to our food prices? </p>
<p>Sometimes good old common sense in these matters can go a long way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

