<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Does Missouri Health Care Compare?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.showmedaily.org/2009/10/how-does-missouri-health.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.showmedaily.org/2009/10/how-does-missouri-health.html</link>
	<description>Advancing liberty with responsibility by promoting market solutions for Missouri public policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:56:48 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christine Harbin</title>
		<link>http://www.showmedaily.org/2009/10/how-does-missouri-health.html/comment-page-1#comment-3795</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine Harbin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 21:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showmedaily.org/?p=7619#comment-3795</guid>
		<description>Anne,

I listened to the same report while driving home from work. I thought that it gave a thorough account about how the incentives to provide quality healthcare are distorted in the status quo. Under methods like &quot;fee for service,&quot; physicians are rewarded for performing unnecessary services; those who provide efficient health care are paid less.

If we really wanted heath reform, we should concentrate on changing on how it is delivered, not how it is financed. We should encourage programs like &quot;fee for performance,&quot; evidence-based medicine, and alternative staffing models like the medical home mode. I agree with you that this is not being addressed in Congress or in the media.

Caitlin,

I agree that there is a myriad of lifestyle decisions that would better affect a person&#039;s health than having additional procedures. More often than not in health care, less is more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anne,</p>
<p>I listened to the same report while driving home from work. I thought that it gave a thorough account about how the incentives to provide quality healthcare are distorted in the status quo. Under methods like &#8220;fee for service,&#8221; physicians are rewarded for performing unnecessary services; those who provide efficient health care are paid less.</p>
<p>If we really wanted heath reform, we should concentrate on changing on how it is delivered, not how it is financed. We should encourage programs like &#8220;fee for performance,&#8221; evidence-based medicine, and alternative staffing models like the medical home mode. I agree with you that this is not being addressed in Congress or in the media.</p>
<p>Caitlin,</p>
<p>I agree that there is a myriad of lifestyle decisions that would better affect a person&#8217;s health than having additional procedures. More often than not in health care, less is more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caitlin Hartsell</title>
		<link>http://www.showmedaily.org/2009/10/how-does-missouri-health.html/comment-page-1#comment-3785</link>
		<dc:creator>Caitlin Hartsell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 15:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showmedaily.org/?p=7619#comment-3785</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think its fair to simply say that we are spending more and getting less.  We are also far more obese than other nations (something like 30% compared to 20%) which is a product of our lifestyles, not our health care.  Something needs to change, but targeting health care may not be the most effective solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think its fair to simply say that we are spending more and getting less.  We are also far more obese than other nations (something like 30% compared to 20%) which is a product of our lifestyles, not our health care.  Something needs to change, but targeting health care may not be the most effective solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne McGregor</title>
		<link>http://www.showmedaily.org/2009/10/how-does-missouri-health.html/comment-page-1#comment-3775</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne McGregor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 18:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showmedaily.org/?p=7619#comment-3775</guid>
		<description>Yesterday NPR did a lengthy report on the efficacy of our health care.  The upshot of a very rigorous study revealed that 30% of the care delivered to patients was not improving their health situation.  The culprit is the &quot;fee for service&quot; model that our health care system is based on.  This, unfortunately, is not being addressed in the health care reform Congress is now debating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday NPR did a lengthy report on the efficacy of our health care.  The upshot of a very rigorous study revealed that 30% of the care delivered to patients was not improving their health situation.  The culprit is the &#8220;fee for service&#8221; model that our health care system is based on.  This, unfortunately, is not being addressed in the health care reform Congress is now debating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

