<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Filmmakers Vote With Their Feet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.showmedaily.org/2009/10/filmmakers-vote-with-their-feet.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.showmedaily.org/2009/10/filmmakers-vote-with-their-feet.html</link>
	<description>Advancing liberty with responsibility by promoting market solutions for Missouri public policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:56:48 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: State Policy Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More on Missouri Film Tax Credits</title>
		<link>http://www.showmedaily.org/2009/10/filmmakers-vote-with-their-feet.html/comment-page-1#comment-4330</link>
		<dc:creator>State Policy Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More on Missouri Film Tax Credits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 16:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showmedaily.org/?p=8269#comment-4330</guid>
		<description>[...] Up in the Air in St. Louis, Jason Reitman curiously didn&#8217;t say that it was because of the $4.5 million in tax credits that he received from the state of Missouri. Instead, he said that it was because of the sheer amount of vacant office space (emphasis added): [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Up in the Air in St. Louis, Jason Reitman curiously didn&#8217;t say that it was because of the $4.5 million in tax credits that he received from the state of Missouri. Instead, he said that it was because of the sheer amount of vacant office space (emphasis added): [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine Harbin</title>
		<link>http://www.showmedaily.org/2009/10/filmmakers-vote-with-their-feet.html/comment-page-1#comment-4225</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine Harbin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showmedaily.org/?p=8269#comment-4225</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s very interesting. If the State were truly focused on creating jobs that are productive and long-term, then they should target post-production activities because they last much longer than film shoots. In the status quo, filmmakers pack up and leave when their shoot is done. 
Do you know of any state that has shifted its attention like this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s very interesting. If the State were truly focused on creating jobs that are productive and long-term, then they should target post-production activities because they last much longer than film shoots. In the status quo, filmmakers pack up and leave when their shoot is done.<br />
Do you know of any state that has shifted its attention like this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lester Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.showmedaily.org/2009/10/filmmakers-vote-with-their-feet.html/comment-page-1#comment-4161</link>
		<dc:creator>Lester Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 18:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showmedaily.org/?p=8269#comment-4161</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know why all the attention is on film shoots. As a producer and artist I believe television production, particularly shows like game shows, would create more long lasting jobs.I also think that other parts of film making and television production (i.e. post production) would also create longer lasting jobs for Missourians. There are many theaters in Branson for instance that could easily be converted to studios for music scoring, mixing, ADR, foley, EFX and all post production instead of just concentrating on shooting. There are msny qualified ex Californians who now live in Southwest Missouri who are capable of doing these jobs and training others to fill those positions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know why all the attention is on film shoots. As a producer and artist I believe television production, particularly shows like game shows, would create more long lasting jobs.I also think that other parts of film making and television production (i.e. post production) would also create longer lasting jobs for Missourians. There are many theaters in Branson for instance that could easily be converted to studios for music scoring, mixing, ADR, foley, EFX and all post production instead of just concentrating on shooting. There are msny qualified ex Californians who now live in Southwest Missouri who are capable of doing these jobs and training others to fill those positions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine Harbin</title>
		<link>http://www.showmedaily.org/2009/10/filmmakers-vote-with-their-feet.html/comment-page-1#comment-3990</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine Harbin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showmedaily.org/?p=8269#comment-3990</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment!
I agree that there are probably better ways to structure these incentive programs. My biggest reason for opposition is the fact that they often add to the burden of existing taxpayers. Also, reducing payroll taxes is always a good idea, IMHO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment!<br />
I agree that there are probably better ways to structure these incentive programs. My biggest reason for opposition is the fact that they often add to the burden of existing taxpayers. Also, reducing payroll taxes is always a good idea, IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vroman</title>
		<link>http://www.showmedaily.org/2009/10/filmmakers-vote-with-their-feet.html/comment-page-1#comment-3987</link>
		<dc:creator>vroman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 05:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showmedaily.org/?p=8269#comment-3987</guid>
		<description>If the state directly hands money over to film-makers before the fact, then I agree that is a subsidy, and defacto corporate welfare, ie bad. However, a tax incentive could be offered successfully, along lines of say, waiving payroll taxes on cast/crew, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the state directly hands money over to film-makers before the fact, then I agree that is a subsidy, and defacto corporate welfare, ie bad. However, a tax incentive could be offered successfully, along lines of say, waiving payroll taxes on cast/crew, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

