<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Knowledge Is Power</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.showmedaily.org/2009/04/knowledge-is-power.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.showmedaily.org/2009/04/knowledge-is-power.html</link>
	<description>Advancing liberty with responsibility by promoting market solutions for Missouri public policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 17:39:11 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ian Titter</title>
		<link>http://www.showmedaily.org/2009/04/knowledge-is-power.html/comment-page-1#comment-2869</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Titter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showmedaily.org/?p=3937#comment-2869</guid>
		<description>Administrators are bureaucrats. They are ruled by precedent and the status quo. Change is threatening and uncomfortable. It is also a potential point of failure. What if it doesn&#039;t work? What if it gores the sacred cow of a more senior bureaucrat? What if it works and makes jobs redundant? My Job?

Budgets are good. They apportion money for established programs. They are a source of stability. They are inflexible and it is too much trouble to go to the finance committee and alter them just because something might be a good idea. A person could get a reputation as a free-thinker, &#039;not one-of-us&#039;. Quash new ideas for now. Safety first!

(One day, when I am a senior bureaucrat, I may be asked to be innovative, forward thinking and progressive, to introduce new and exciting programs. It will be a good idea to have a few possibilities up my sleeve at the time so I&#039;m not caught short. If I&#039;m not asked, no great loss. We already perform well enough. Why change?)

Mediocrity rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Administrators are bureaucrats. They are ruled by precedent and the status quo. Change is threatening and uncomfortable. It is also a potential point of failure. What if it doesn&#8217;t work? What if it gores the sacred cow of a more senior bureaucrat? What if it works and makes jobs redundant? My Job?</p>
<p>Budgets are good. They apportion money for established programs. They are a source of stability. They are inflexible and it is too much trouble to go to the finance committee and alter them just because something might be a good idea. A person could get a reputation as a free-thinker, &#8216;not one-of-us&#8217;. Quash new ideas for now. Safety first!</p>
<p>(One day, when I am a senior bureaucrat, I may be asked to be innovative, forward thinking and progressive, to introduce new and exciting programs. It will be a good idea to have a few possibilities up my sleeve at the time so I&#8217;m not caught short. If I&#8217;m not asked, no great loss. We already perform well enough. Why change?)</p>
<p>Mediocrity rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

