<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Legislators Say, &#8220;Never Again!&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.showmedaily.org/2009/03/legislators-say-never-again.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.showmedaily.org/2009/03/legislators-say-never-again.html</link>
	<description>Advancing liberty with responsibility by promoting market solutions for Missouri public policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 17:39:11 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Are Duomoms as Bad as Octomoms? &#124; www.statehousecall.org</title>
		<link>http://www.showmedaily.org/2009/03/legislators-say-never-again.html/comment-page-1#comment-3971</link>
		<dc:creator>Are Duomoms as Bad as Octomoms? &#124; www.statehousecall.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 01:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showmedaily.org/?p=3354#comment-3971</guid>
		<description>[...] twins. Just as many people called for restrictions on in vitro fertilization after Nadya Suleman gave birth to octuplets, some medical experts are outraged by the far more commonplace occurrence of twin births — and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] twins. Just as many people called for restrictions on in vitro fertilization after Nadya Suleman gave birth to octuplets, some medical experts are outraged by the far more commonplace occurrence of twin births — and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zapper6264-news</title>
		<link>http://www.showmedaily.org/2009/03/legislators-say-never-again.html/comment-page-1#comment-1997</link>
		<dc:creator>zapper6264-news</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 14:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showmedaily.org/?p=3354#comment-1997</guid>
		<description>What is it with our State Legislature? They are always meddling in the world of human reproduction. When I look at our legislator, I cannot imagine any women wanting him to make such decisions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is it with our State Legislature? They are always meddling in the world of human reproduction. When I look at our legislator, I cannot imagine any women wanting him to make such decisions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clovis Ouangraoua</title>
		<link>http://www.showmedaily.org/2009/03/legislators-say-never-again.html/comment-page-1#comment-1959</link>
		<dc:creator>Clovis Ouangraoua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 22:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showmedaily.org/?p=3354#comment-1959</guid>
		<description>The rule of thumb is: Don&#039;t have more children than you could afford to take care of. Don&#039;t give the burden of raising your children to the State&#039;s taxpayers. Have 8, 14, 20, as many as you could, just make sure you are able to take care of them. I don&#039;t think people have money to finance your pricy undertakings. Same message to welfare recipients. We all could do it, why aren&#039;t we? And what entitles her to have 14 kids? Nothing, but her free will.And I do believe in this situation/case, a limit/ban should be placed on that free will. What Nadya doesn&#039;t know (or maybe she wanted it after all) is that she is setting up a precedent for a lot of lawmakers. The line is, &quot;Take care of it, or if you can&#039;t, don&#039;t do it.&quot; Two or three of the kids are coming home next week from the hospital, she doesn&#039;t even know how to handle the situation. My idea is that they&#039;ll end up for adoption. Times are too tough for unconscious moves of the kind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rule of thumb is: Don&#8217;t have more children than you could afford to take care of. Don&#8217;t give the burden of raising your children to the State&#8217;s taxpayers. Have 8, 14, 20, as many as you could, just make sure you are able to take care of them. I don&#8217;t think people have money to finance your pricy undertakings. Same message to welfare recipients. We all could do it, why aren&#8217;t we? And what entitles her to have 14 kids? Nothing, but her free will.And I do believe in this situation/case, a limit/ban should be placed on that free will. What Nadya doesn&#8217;t know (or maybe she wanted it after all) is that she is setting up a precedent for a lot of lawmakers. The line is, &#8220;Take care of it, or if you can&#8217;t, don&#8217;t do it.&#8221; Two or three of the kids are coming home next week from the hospital, she doesn&#8217;t even know how to handle the situation. My idea is that they&#8217;ll end up for adoption. Times are too tough for unconscious moves of the kind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

