Asian Education
Two Million Minutes has done a good job of drawing attention to educational disparities around the world. I’ve been somewhat annoyed with it, though, for its lack of ideas on how to solve America’s education problems. For example, it’s true that many Asian students spend more time than their American peers on schoolwork. But if the typical U.S. school is doing a bad job, surely adding an hour or two onto the school day isn’t going to transform them into high-quality institutions overnight. Then this morning I read the Two Million Minutes blog and was very pleasantly surprised:
President Obama is correct–there is a remarkable amount of innovation and success taking place in American education–most of it outside of the public school system.
At last, Two Million Minutes recognizes that there are different kinds of schools in the United States, and some are doing well. It goes on to discuss successful private schools and charter schools. (One minor point: charter schools are public schools too. They just face different rules and incentives from traditional public schools.)
Two Millions Minutes has posted some videos of young students learning Mandarin Chinese and Spanish at the Renaissance School in Florida. This private school’s curriculum looks impressive: accelerated math, lots of foreign language time, clear goals for science and history. It even has its own blog with links to articles about U.S. and Asian education.
However, there is a downside of the focus on Asian education. Asian educational programs are great, if that’s what parents want. We need to concentrate on creating an education market full of innovative choices — not on requiring everyone to learn two languages and algebra by fourth grade. As an illustration of the dangers of obsessing over achievement, look at this news story, linked to from the Renaissance School blog. It’s about a father who wants his daughter to go live with people who are more intellectual than he and his wife are, all for the sake of better mental cultivation. I think that’s even more bizarre than Nadya Suleman.





I am the parent of a very lucky little girl who just happens to attend The Panama City Renaissance School(PCRS). Finding a wonderful school that offers an advanced curriculum is a blessing, not an obsession for me. It all depends on how the children are taught…At PCRS, learning is fun for the children and there is time for extra-curricular activities. I am sure that, after an education at PCRS, my daughter will be able to attend the college of her choosing. I am thrilled to be a part of something so wonderful.
Comment by Kelley Caspary — March 22, 2009 @ 5:12 p.m.
Thanks for the comment. I didn’t mean to knock the Renaissance School. My point was only that an accelerated curriculum is not the right choice for everyone.
Comment by Sarah Brodsky — March 23, 2009 @ 6:57 a.m.
Our daughter is a 3rd grader at the Panama City Renaissance School (PCRS) and she thinks it’s great. The teachers and director use the curriculum to challenge, engage and teach the students in a way that gives them confidence in their academic knowledge and social skills. We are thankful that our daughter and her friends have the opportunity to go to such an amazing school. If even 1/2 of the US will ever get such an outstanding education, our country will be respectable in ways that we have never before been. I often tell our director that she would be a tremendous asset to our national education task force – she makes learning fun. The kids love going to school at PCRS.
Comment by LeeAnn Kozan — April 28, 2009 @ 9:28 p.m.