<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on Single-Sex Classrooms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.showmedaily.org/2009/02/more-on-single-sex-classrooms.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.showmedaily.org/2009/02/more-on-single-sex-classrooms.html</link>
	<description>Advancing liberty with responsibility by promoting market solutions for Missouri public policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 17:39:11 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe Nonnenkamp</title>
		<link>http://www.showmedaily.org/2009/02/more-on-single-sex-classrooms.html/comment-page-1#comment-1871</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Nonnenkamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 03:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showmedaily.org/?p=3186#comment-1871</guid>
		<description>Different things work for different kids. Everyone is different, and everyone learns differently. We should not have public schools. I know that sounds radical, but if we didn&#039;t have public schools, there would be an abundance of choice for everyone, from no-frills schools to luxurious ones, with a range of economic choice as well.

We didn&#039;t have public schools until the late 1800s, and we did just fine without them. They were established because a bunch of neo-Puritan post-millennial crazies were afraid that parochial schools would Catholicize the country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Different things work for different kids. Everyone is different, and everyone learns differently. We should not have public schools. I know that sounds radical, but if we didn&#8217;t have public schools, there would be an abundance of choice for everyone, from no-frills schools to luxurious ones, with a range of economic choice as well.</p>
<p>We didn&#8217;t have public schools until the late 1800s, and we did just fine without them. They were established because a bunch of neo-Puritan post-millennial crazies were afraid that parochial schools would Catholicize the country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.showmedaily.org/2009/02/more-on-single-sex-classrooms.html/comment-page-1#comment-1776</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 22:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showmedaily.org/?p=3186#comment-1776</guid>
		<description>Options and &quot;foot-voting&quot; are so very important. There is a mistaken belief common among public school advocates that we must figure out what &quot;works best&quot; and have everyone do that. Your point that average children doing better not being an indicator of particular children&#039;s performance is excellent. People are different. Let&#039;s let them be that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Options and &#8220;foot-voting&#8221; are so very important. There is a mistaken belief common among public school advocates that we must figure out what &#8220;works best&#8221; and have everyone do that. Your point that average children doing better not being an indicator of particular children&#8217;s performance is excellent. People are different. Let&#8217;s let them be that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

