<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Non Sequitur of the Day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.showmedaily.org/2009/01/non-sequitur-of-the-day.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.showmedaily.org/2009/01/non-sequitur-of-the-day.html</link>
	<description>Advancing liberty with responsibility by promoting market solutions for Missouri public policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 17:39:11 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Clovis Ouangraoua</title>
		<link>http://www.showmedaily.org/2009/01/non-sequitur-of-the-day.html/comment-page-1#comment-1621</link>
		<dc:creator>Clovis Ouangraoua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showmedaily.org/?p=2893#comment-1621</guid>
		<description>That was my bad! Misunderstanding... Got you now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was my bad! Misunderstanding&#8230; Got you now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Brodsky</title>
		<link>http://www.showmedaily.org/2009/01/non-sequitur-of-the-day.html/comment-page-1#comment-1619</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Brodsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showmedaily.org/?p=2893#comment-1619</guid>
		<description>No. I&#039;m saying it&#039;s not realistic that such a small increase in premiums would cover a huge increase in costs. I didn&#039;t advocate a discount anywhere in the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No. I&#8217;m saying it&#8217;s not realistic that such a small increase in premiums would cover a huge increase in costs. I didn&#8217;t advocate a discount anywhere in the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clovis Ouangraoua</title>
		<link>http://www.showmedaily.org/2009/01/non-sequitur-of-the-day.html/comment-page-1#comment-1615</link>
		<dc:creator>Clovis Ouangraoua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showmedaily.org/?p=2893#comment-1615</guid>
		<description>Are you maintaining that since the number of children patients increased the treatment should be free or highly discounted? I doubt this woould happen. It&#039;s like you said, &quot;no free lunch&quot;. Let&#039;s face the fact: a discounted insurance premium won&#039;t solve the issue. The bill&#039;s too high.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you maintaining that since the number of children patients increased the treatment should be free or highly discounted? I doubt this woould happen. It&#8217;s like you said, &#8220;no free lunch&#8221;. Let&#8217;s face the fact: a discounted insurance premium won&#8217;t solve the issue. The bill&#8217;s too high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

