<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Accountability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.showmedaily.org/2008/11/accountability.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.showmedaily.org/2008/11/accountability.html</link>
	<description>Advancing liberty with responsibility by promoting market solutions for Missouri public policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 19:02:29 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Brodsky</title>
		<link>http://www.showmedaily.org/2008/11/accountability.html/comment-page-1#comment-1249</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Brodsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showmedaily.org/?p=2000#comment-1249</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Josh. That&#039;s an excellent point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Josh. That&#8217;s an excellent point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.showmedaily.org/2008/11/accountability.html/comment-page-1#comment-1239</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showmedaily.org/?p=2000#comment-1239</guid>
		<description>I completely agree with you, but what you left out is that Riverview Gardens needn&#039;t improve in the face of competition. They could go out of business. This wouldn&#039;t be so bad, given that in this scenario they will have shown in the face of the strongest incentive one can offer(oblivion) they couldn&#039;t educate satisfactorily. Obviously, in that case, these people would be better employed elsewhere in the economy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with you, but what you left out is that Riverview Gardens needn&#8217;t improve in the face of competition. They could go out of business. This wouldn&#8217;t be so bad, given that in this scenario they will have shown in the face of the strongest incentive one can offer(oblivion) they couldn&#8217;t educate satisfactorily. Obviously, in that case, these people would be better employed elsewhere in the economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

