This Blog Post Has Not Been Approved by the General Assembly
This story in the Post-Dispatch reminds me of the official state animals and desserts that Missouri schoolchildren have been shepherding through the General Assembly lately.
At first glance, it may seem unrelated. The article I link to reports on the case of a proposed “Choose Life” license plate, which was rejected by legislators. The Alliance Defense Fund argues that rejecting the plate violated free speech, while the state maintains that it has veto power over messages on plates.
I don’t know enough about the legal considerations here to comment on which side is right. But I immediately thought of the official invertebrates, because that’s another issue on which the state arbitrarily endorses certain positions. The case was made for crayfish; now crayfish are “official.” Crayfish generally stay out of controversy, so it was easy to get them approved. Lawmakers are understandably a bit more hesitant to place their stamp of approval on a message about abortion.
We could avoid this problem altogether if we said, “Enough is enough.” No official animals, and no official messages on license plates. If people want to promote the “Choose Life” message, they can display bumper stickers. Fans of crayfish, ice cream, and whatever else can decorate their cars to reflect their preferences. The General Assembly doesn’t need to be involved.





Agreed. While we’re at it, let’s go back to the old, brick-colored license plates. The new pastel ones remind me of George Costanza’s “Morning Mist” plane travel outfit.
Comment by Mike S. — October 17, 2008 @ 12:54 p.m.
If we’re going to require cars to have license plates, I don’t have a problem with allowing people to choose plates designed to support a certain cause or express an idea. In fact, I LOVE the ability to choose a more attractive plate and support a favored cause while doing so. But all causes and ideas have to be treated equally — the government can’t favor certain of them and reject (or unfairly burden) others. And (as sad and ridiculous as it is) if the government is concerned that some controversial cause or idea may make an appearance, then perhaps it should only permit the one-size-fits-all, grammatically-incorrect generic plate.
Comment by Dave Roland — October 17, 2008 @ 2:16 p.m.