January 31, 2008

Changing the Rules for Initiative Petitions

I respectfully, yet strongly, disagree with my colleague Dave Roland’s post yesterday on changes to the initiative petition/constitutional amendment rules in Missouri. We are a republic, not a direct democracy. We elect people to make laws and decisions. If they are not doing a good job, then we should elect different people. These petition-gathering amendment drives have led to some terrible legislation, in my opinion, such as the recent minimum-wage increase. They have also led to some excellent legislation, such as the Hancock Amendment. However, as more people and organizations become willing to pay people to gather signatures for pet causes, I believe it is reasonable to increase the amount of signatures required.

I disagree with some of the suggested changes, particularly the requirement that petition gatherers must be residents of Missouri. That is just silly. I support the increase in signatures required and the restriction on paying people by the signature, which is just an open invitation to fraud.

A project of the

 


Download the Show-Me Institute's iphone app. Download the Show-Me Institute's android app. Sign up for the Show-Me Institute's RSS feed
Follow the Show-Me Institute on Facebook Follow the Show-Me Institute on Twitter Watch the Show-Me Institute on YouTube

The views expressed by each contributor to this blog are those of that contributor alone, and do not necessarily represent the views of the Show-Me Institute.

Welcome to the official blog of the Show-Me Institute. Here you'll find daily commentary by Show-Me Institute staff and scholars.



Recent Posts

View a random entry.

Archives

Categories

Links

Missouri

Free Market

Sister Organizations

Powered by Wordpress