<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Know Some People Can&#8217;t Fathom This, But &#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.showmedaily.org/2007/08/i-know-some-peo.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.showmedaily.org/2007/08/i-know-some-peo.html</link>
	<description>Advancing liberty with responsibility by promoting market solutions for Missouri public policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:03:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Brodsky</title>
		<link>http://www.showmedaily.org/2007/08/i-know-some-peo.html/comment-page-1#comment-1635</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Brodsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showmeliving.org/daily/?p=76#comment-1635</guid>
		<description>&quot;It can be shown graphically&quot;
Don&#039;t even think about it. I&#039;ll get nightmares that I&#039;m back in college.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It can be shown graphically&#8221;<br />
Don&#8217;t even think about it. I&#8217;ll get nightmares that I&#8217;m back in college.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.showmedaily.org/2007/08/i-know-some-peo.html/comment-page-1#comment-1633</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.showmeliving.org/daily/?p=76#comment-1633</guid>
		<description>This is a great post, but I&#039;d like to point out that any economist will tell you that government transfers which are not in the form of money involve some dead-weight loss. It can be shown graphically that food stamps are no better than housing vouchers at satisfying people&#039;s particular preferences, since marginal amounts of housing or food can&#039;t be substituted for other needs/wants.

The main support for keeping such programs is a combination of misunderstanding of economics and paternalism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great post, but I&#8217;d like to point out that any economist will tell you that government transfers which are not in the form of money involve some dead-weight loss. It can be shown graphically that food stamps are no better than housing vouchers at satisfying people&#8217;s particular preferences, since marginal amounts of housing or food can&#8217;t be substituted for other needs/wants.</p>
<p>The main support for keeping such programs is a combination of misunderstanding of economics and paternalism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
